Search the site:

Browse by category:

This article's comments feed.

Life, death, and the most incredible photograph ever taken.

Nov 12, 01:36 PM · from the mouth of Tyler

Last week was hard. My father-in-law died last Friday of a heart attack. It was completely unexpected. Jess and the baby and I drove up to Boston immediately to be with her mom. The next week followed with uncountable visits with family and friends, eating food, and offering toasts in his honor. The wake was on Wednesday, and it’s by far the hardest thing I’ve ever done. Situated next to the casket with Jess and her mother and brother, we stood in one spot for 5 hours as hundreds of Jim’s friends, family, colleagues, and acquaintances filed past, offering their condolences, many on the verge of crying. And I was just the son-in-law… It must have been immeasurably more difficult for Jess’s mom.

My baby boy was what got me through it. I held him through the whole thing, and his innocence and sweetness had an incredible mood-lifting effect. His very presence brought smiles to so many faces. At one point during the wake, he fell asleep in my arms. I could have easily laid him down and given my back a rest for a while, but holding him brought comfort.

This juxtaposition of death and new life fills me with thoughts and feelings that I’m not eloquent enough to articulate. Instead I’ll share this article I found this morning. It’s not directly related to anything I’ve mentioned, but on a more deeper and more profound level, I find significance.

You’ll recall previous discussion of the movie, “What the Bleep Do We Know?!”... Well I receive a monthly newsletter from the movie makers called “The Bleeping Herald”. This article was in today’s issue. It’ll take a few minutes to read, but I encourage you to do so. Click the photo for a link to the original article.

. . . . .

Window of Possibility: Why the Hubble Ultra Deep Field is the most incredible photograph ever taken

by Anthony Doerr. Reprinted by permission from Orion magazine. (Permission has NOT however, been granted to post it here on GoofyGuys.)

We live on Earth. Earth is a clump of iron and magnesium and nickel, smeared with a thin layer of organic matter, and sleeved in vapor. It whirls along in a nearly circular orbit around a minor star we call the sun.

I know, the sun doesn’t seem minor. The sun puts the energy in our salads, milkshakes, hamburgers, gas tanks, and oceans. It literally makes the world go round. And it’s huge: The Earth is a chickpea and the sun is a beach ball. The sun comprises 99.9 percent of all the mass in the solar system. Which means Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, etc., all fit into that little 0.1 percent.

But, truly, our sun is exceedingly minor. Almost incomprehensibly minor.

We call our galaxy the Milky Way. There are at least 100 billion stars in it and our sun is one of those. A hundred billion is a big number, and humans are not evolved to appreciate numbers like that, but here’s a try: If you had a bucket with a thousand marbles in it, you would need to procure 999,999 more of those buckets to get a billion marbles. Then you’d have to repeat the process a hundred times to get as many marbles as there are stars in our galaxy.

That’s a lot of marbles.

So. The Earth is massive enough to hold all of our cities and oceans and creatures in the sway of its gravity. And the sun is massive enough to hold the Earth in the sway of its gravity. But the sun itself is merely a mote in the sway of the gravity of the Milky Way, at the center of which is a vast, concentrated bar of stars, around which the sun swings (carrying along Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, etc.) every 230 million years or so. Our sun isn’t anywhere near the center; it’s way out on one of the galaxy’s minor arms. We live beyond the suburbs of the Milky Way. We live in Nowheresville.

But still, we are in the Milky Way. And that’s a big deal, right? The Milky Way is at least a major galaxy, right?

Not really. Spiral-shaped, toothpick-shaped, sombrero-shaped – in the visible universe, at any given moment, there are hundreds of thousands of millions of galaxies. Maybe as many as 125 billion. There very well may be more galaxies in the universe than there are stars in the Milky Way.

So. Let’s say there are 100 billion stars in our galaxy. And let’s say there are 100 billion galaxies in our universe. At any given moment, then, assuming ultra-massive and dwarf galaxies average each other out, there might be 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the universe. That’s 1.0 X 10 to the twenty-second power. That’s 10 sextillion.

Here’s a way of looking at it: there are enough stars in the universe that if everybody on Earth were charged with naming his or her share, we’d each get to name a trillion and a half of them. Even that number is still impossibly hard to comprehend – if you named a star every time your heart beat for your whole life, you’d have to live about 375 lifetimes to name your share.

Last year, a handful of astronomers met in London to vote on the top ten images taken by the Hubble Telescope in its sixteen years in operation. They chose some beauties: the Cat’s Eye Nebula, the Sombrero Galaxy, the Hourglass Nebula. But conspicuously missing from their list was the Hubble Ultra Deep Field image. It is, I believe, the most incredible photograph ever taken.

In 2003, Hubble astronomers chose a random wedge of sky just below the constellation Orion and, during four hundred orbits of the Earth, over the course of several months, took a photograph with a million-second-long exposure. It was something like peering through an eight-foot soda straw with one big, superhuman eye at the same wedge of space for eleven straight nights.

What they found there was breathtaking: a shard of the early universe that contains a bewildering array of galaxies and pre-galactic lumps. Scrolling through it is eerily similar to peering at a drop of pond water through a microscope: one expects the galaxies to start squirming like paramecia. It bewilders and disorients; the dark patches swarm with questions. If you peered into just one of its black corners, took an Ultra Deep Field of the Ultra Deep Field, would you see as much all over again?

What the Ultra Deep Field image ultimately offers is a singular glimpse at ourselves. Like Copernicus’s On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres, it resets our understanding of who and what we are.

As of early April 2007, astronomers had found 204 planets outside our solar system. They seem to be everywhere we look. Chances are, many, many stars have planets or systems of planets swinging around them. What if most suns have solar systems? If our sun is one in 10 sextillion, could our Earth be one in 10 sextillion as well? Or the Earth might be one – just one, the only one, the one. Either way, the circumstances are mind-boggling.

The Hubble Ultra Deep Field is an infinitesimally slender core-sample drilled out of the universe. And yet inside it is enough vastness to do violence to a person’s common sense. How can the window of possibility be so unfathomably large?

TAKE YOURSELF OUT TO A FIELD some evening after everyone else is asleep. Listen to the migrant birds whisking past in the dark; listen to the creaking and settling of the world. Think about the teeming, microscopic worlds beneath your shoes – the continents of soil, the galaxies of bacteria. Then lift your face up.

The night sky is the coolest Advent calendar imaginable: it is composed of an infinite number of doors. Open one and find ten thousand galaxies hiding behind it, streaming away at hundreds of miles per second. Open another, and another. You gaze up into history; you stare into the limits of your own understanding. The past flies toward you at the speed of light. Why are you here? Why are the stars there? Is it even remotely possible that our one, tiny, eggshell world is the only one encrusted with life?

The Hubble Ultra Deep Field image should be in every classroom in the world. It should be on the president’s desk. It should probably be in every church, too. “To sense that behind anything that can be experienced,” Einstein once said, “there is a something that our mind cannot grasp and whose beauty and sublimity reaches us only indirectly and as a feeble reflection, this is religiousness.”

Whatever we believe in – God, children, nationhood – nothing can be more important than to take a moment every now and then and accept the invitation of the sky: to leave the confines of ourselves and fly off into the hugeness of the universe, to disappear into the inexplicable, the implacable, the reflection of that something our minds cannot grasp.


Comment [5]

  1. Andy responds with:

    Wow Ty. I’m so sorry to hear about your father-in-law! I was just thinking of him yesterday – I can never forget all of the beer that he brought to your wedding! I’m glad Kieran could bring some solace and comfort. Please pass on my condolences to Jess and the rest of the family.

    I find it fascinating that human troubles lead us to contemplate the vastness of the universe. Is it, perhaps, comforting that we are, indeed, all so insignificant? Or maybe the comfort comes from the fact that there is so much undiscovered beauty still out there.

    · Nov 12, 04:42 PM
  2. Tyler responds with:

    Both are excellent points, Andy.

    I forgot to mention that this coming weekend, I’ll be in idyllic Redding, CT, with a sampling of the now infamous Earl Grey Pale Ale. Any takers? Let me know if you’d like to come over. Uncle Mike and family will be there on Saturday night, so that might be a good time to come. Uncle Mike is always a hoot. Or Sunday night, if you feel like it. Plus, we’ll be there the following weekend as well, which is the weekend AFTER Thanksgiving. Let me know if you’d like to swing by for an evening of food, drink, and merriment.

    · Nov 12, 06:01 PM
  3. Iak responds with:

    Send my condolences too, that’s terrible.

    The article you posted reminds me of the Universe Song from Meaning of Life.

    I’m not positive off the top of my head, but this weekend I think I’m free for some merriment.

    · Nov 12, 11:21 PM
  4. Andy responds with:

    Not sure if we can make Redding this weekend, but definitely right after Thanksgiving. It’d be a shame to miss Uncle Mike, though!

    I wonder if going to Redding would conflict with our supposed high school reunion…

    · Nov 13, 01:06 AM
  5. Tyler responds with:

    On a happier note…

    Here’s a new video of my super-adorable baby boy!!!

    · Nov 14, 05:34 PM
  Textile Help

More Goofiness.